I don't mean to be a pest-just hoping that someone may have some input 
on this.
> First off, thanks for looking  :-)
>
> Our network topology has changed recently, and I'm looking for some 
> guidance on the best way to set up our traffic shaping rules across 
> two instances on m0n0 on two Soekris net4801 routers. Our current 
> setup looks like this:
>
> 4 bonded T1s (6.0Mbps total up/down) muxed together via an Adtran 924e 
> IAD
> Router1: Soekris net4801 w/lan1641 card for a total of 7 ports-running 
> m0n0 1.22
> -Internal subnet 192.168.1.0
> -VoIP gateway DMZ 192.168.2.0 (separate WAN IP routed via 1:1 NAT)
> -Stats server DMZ 192.168.3.0 (separate WAN IP routed via 1:1 NAT)
> -Admin subnet 192.168.4.0
>
> Router2: Soekris net4801 w/lan1641 card for a total of 7 ports-running 
> m0n0 1.22
> -WebServer DMZ 192.168.5.0 (separate WAN IP routed via 1:1 NAT)
> -WebServer2 DMZ 192.168.6.0 (separate WAN IP routed via 1:1 NAT)
>
> The way I have the traffic shaper set up currently Router1 is 
> allocated 2Mbps, and Router2 is allocated 4Mbps total bandwidth. What 
> we are finding during our testing is that Router2 needs more bandwidth 
> during peak usage periods. Ideally, Router2 could use another Mbit for 
> a total of 5Mbps. If I reconfigure the traffic shaper on Router2 for a 
> total of 5Mbps I will be taking needed bandwidth away from the stats 
> server and VoIP gateway on Router1.
>
> If it helps, the peak traffic periods of each Router are at different 
> times during the day. Aside from not using the traffic shaper at all 
> (or adding more T1s) is there any way that I can safely add pipe 
> limits to one Router without hurting the other one?
>
> Thanks in advance for any input available.
>
>
> Chris Janvrin
> Dover, NH USA
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>
>