[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Chris Janvrin" <chrisjanvrin at sellmytimesharenow dot com>
 To:  "'Alexander Schaber'" <lists at alexanderschaber dot de>
 Cc:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Hardware Question
 Date:  Tue, 7 Nov 2006 13:56:27 -0500
For what it's worth, both machines would be more than ample to run m0n0. You
could make the argument that more is better, but m0n0 isn't very hardware
intensive. For what it's worth, the company I work for runs two instances of
m0n0 on two Soekris net 4801-50 embedded PCs and we haven't had any problems
at all. That is, no problems that weren't created by me ;)

To give you an idea of what kind of workout our Soekris boxes get, here's a
quick list of what we run:

86 Windows PCs (running Wink2k and XP)
3 Linux PCs
5 network printers
3 fileservers running various flavors of nix
1 Windows update server
1 NAS running nix
4 T1 lines muxed via an Adtran 924e
1 Wireless access point serving a half dozen laptops
1 VoIP gateway serving 10 IP phones to remote locations

1 webserver with two single core Opterons and four NICs
1 fileserver with two dual core Opterons and three NICs

At any given time router2 is handling 40-50 concurrent users accessing our
webserver using SSL on port 443. Neither Router has given us any headaches
whatsoever, and will easily handle our 6Mbps pipe on the WAN side-even with
all of the secure sessions. We have less than $800 invested between both
routers-and that price includes four extra power supplies.

Before going with the Soekris boxes we experimented with a couple of old
desktop PCs and servers. We found that quality NICs (like Intel or 3Com) are
more important than processor speed. A fast PC running Realtek NICs for
example will frequently be outperformed by a slower PC running quality Intel
or 3Com NICs. 

Hope this helps :)

Chris Janvrin

-----Original Message-----
From: Alexander Schaber [mailto:lists at alexanderschaber dot de] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:54 PM
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: [m0n0wall] Hardware Question

Hello m0n0-list,

until now I've driven m0n0 on a regular P3 500 MHz on regular PC hardware.
I'm using m0n0 for basic routing, DHCP, DNS and have 6 3COM NICs installed. 
(These will be transferred in any case).

Now I've got the choice for a new hardware fundation:

1 -
Dell Poweredge 2300
CPU: P2 400 MHz
RAM: 256 MB
HDD: SCSI 9 GB Harddrive (might even have another one to run a mirror raid)

2 -
Regular PC
CPU P4 1.7 GHz (some ASUS MB)
RAM: 256 MB

I really don't know which one would be better for m0n0 since it has to be a
fast and still reliable router and I guess a Dell Server is somehow made for
running 24/7. But there is the SCSI Drive from which m0n0 has to boot. Is
that a problem?
Of course the P4 alot faster but is the standard PC hardware as reliable as
the server architecture in the Dell?

Please give you're opinion and also give me a hint about what is really
important for a good throughput. Of course - NICs - are important, but what


To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch