Chris Buechler wrote, On 11/21/2006 5:08 PM:
> On 11/21/06, D. Ryan Spott <rspott at cspott dot com> wrote:
>>
>> I am attempting to do a 1:1 NAT tunnel from 1.2.3.5 (proxy-arp-ed on the
>> WAN side of monowall 1 to 192.168.2.3. Through the ipsec tunnel.
>>
>> If I setup the 1:1 NAT tunnel from 1.2.3.5 (proxy-arp-ed on the WAN side
>> of monowall 1 to 192.168.1.3 it works.
>>
>> If I setup the 1:1 NAT tunnel from 1.2.3.5 (proxy-arp-ed on the WAN side
>> of monowall 1 to 192.168.2.3 it does not work.
>>
>
> I'm not sure if this will work or not, but in order for packets
> originating from m0n0wall to traverse the VPN, you need to follow
> this:
> http://doc.m0n0.ch/handbook/faq-snmpovervpn.html
>
> My guess is it may work with the static route in place.  Report back
> and let us know if that works.
>
> -Chris
It looks like this worked for the most part. I will post another 
question that popped up in just a bit.

Thanks for the help, if I knew to search for SNMP for a forwarding issue 
I would have! :)

ryan