[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "David Kitchens" <spider at webweaver dot com>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Feature Request
 Date:  Thu, 4 Jan 2007 18:32:12 -0500
Point taken, I hadn't thought of tweaking just the firewall rule but in most
cases I have ran into, the two rules are meant to be together. All I was
hoping for was a checkbox option like we have on the NAT page that would
update the other rule if the user wanted to. It doesn't have to be a
mandatory thing, but most of the time I have needed to edit both. Example
for my situation is port 3389, 99% of the time, I have it set to my
workstation so I can get to it remotely, here and there I need to let
someone use Terminal Services to get to my W2K3 server and I have to change
the rules. I am not a programmer so I didn't know if this could be done but
figured I would throw it out to the list and see. Having a drop menu for
aliases seems like it should be fairly simple, that's more cosmetic than
anything else.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neil A. Hillard [mailto:m0n0 at dana dot org dot uk] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 3:41 PM
> To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Feature Request
> Hi,
> In message <459D622B dot 6090906 at gmx dot de>, Carsten Holbach 
> <Carsten dot Holbach at gmx dot de> writes
> >I support this feature request!
> >
> >David Kitchens schrieb:
> >> While I love the "Auto-add a firewall rule" option in NAT, 
> I find it 
> >>odd  that when I want to edit a NAT rule, this feature is 
> not there. 
> >>It seems  like it should be able to change to "Update the firewall 
> >>rule" when you Edit  a NAT setting. Currently, if I want to 
> edit a NAT 
> >>rule, I also have to edit  the firewall rule. Would this be 
> possible to do?
> >>   Second thought, since we have the blue fields for Aliases, could 
> >>the fields  be drop down lists of available aliases? Not a 
> major issue 
> >>but a thought  since I am editing rules right at the moment.
> >>   Also, a quick report on a production Net 4511 upgrade to 1.3b2:
> >>   Upgrade was painless, everything worked that I use. Web and mail 
> >>services  working to two servers, VLANs working, VPN's to several 
> >>clients work fine,  (all connected to M0n0wall 1.22). My mini-pci 
> >>wireless B is more stable now  than it was under 4.11, it 
> used to stop 
> >>working now and then.. The webgui is  slightly slower than 
> it was but 
> >>a 4511 is only a 133mhz so I expected that  and can deal with it. 
> >>Overall, a fine piece of work and a painless upgrade  as usual with 
> >>M0n0wall!
> I can see how it could be useful but I don't think it is that 
> easy to implement.  The two tables are completely separate so 
> some form of link between the two would need to be maintained.
> What happens when you've 'tweaked' the firewall rule?  Would 
> the link be severed or would the NAT rule update overwrite 
> the firewall rule changes?
> When adding a rule it's a bit of a no-brainer but maintaining 
> from then on wouldn't be particularly easy... unless I've 
> missed something obvious!
> My 2p worth!
> ATB,
>                                 Neil.
> -- 
> Neil A. Hillard                E-Mail:   m0n0 at dana dot org dot uk
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch