[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Mark Rupright <mark at fivepetals dot net>
 To:  Sven Brill <madde at gmx dot net>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] the meaning of FAQ 16.3
 Date:  Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:52:57 -0600 (CST)
How about an addendum that states "looping back through the firewall is not a good idea and shows
poor form"

or not...

----- Original Message -----
From: Sven Brill <madde at gmx dot net>
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 6:42:04 AM GMT-0600 US/Central
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] the meaning of FAQ 16.3

Paulo Meireles wrote:
>>
>> Let me put this in cartoon script form...
>>
>> [..]
> [..]
>
>
> Notice how there is no "off stage" voice? The firewall is not 
> involved, as all the action happens in the internal network... Search 
> Google for "Split-DNS" and you'll get the broader picture.

can we PLEASE add both scripts with the supplied explanation to the 
official FAQ? :)

Sven

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch