[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Steve Thomas" <sthomas at consultant dot com>
 To:  "Rolf Kutz" <kutz at netcologne dot de>, m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] 1.22 or 1.3b2 for simple vpn/pptp?
 Date:  Sat, 03 Feb 2007 13:20:18 -0500
>>1.22 is more stable than 1.3b2, but supports less Hardware. More stable
in what way? The feedback I've been reading on the list is just the
reverse.Some people have had random lockups under 1.22, but noweverything
is fine on 1.3b2. ???

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: "Rolf Kutz"
  To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
  Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] 1.22 or 1.3b2 for simple vpn/pptp?
  Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 17:55:16 +0100


  * Quoting ae roy roy (ae dot roy at operamail dot com):

  > I'm looking at using monowall as a pptp-server at my childrens
  > school. Should I go for 1.22 or 1.3b2?

  Hi ae roy roy,

  this depends on your Hardware. 1.22 is more stable
  than 1.3b2, but supports less Hardware. 1.22 has
  less overhead (esp. on embedded HW). 1.3b2 might
  support SMP. For production I would use 1.22 if I
  can since it is much more stable and not such a
  moving target. Personally I use 1.23b3 mostly
  because it supports the watchdog on wrap
  (although it never had to trigger so far).

  Regards, Rolf

  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
  For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch