[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Lonnie Abelbeck <lists at lonnie dot abelbeck dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall List <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Cc:  Steve Thomas <sthomas at consultant dot com>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Hardware suggestion
 Date:  Thu, 8 Feb 2007 07:29:22 -0600
Steve, et al.
> "the issue that the 4801 shares interrupts
> on the NICS. ... Separate interrupts are better.

Does enabling 'polling' on the net4801's NIC's mitigate the shared  
IRQ issue you raise?

Lonnie

On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:31 PM, Steve Thomas wrote:

>  Well a driver bug in combination with the issue that the 4801 shares
> interrupts
> on the NICS. The shared interrupt part of that can't be fixed, and  
> bugs
> can
> re-appear sometimes. Separate interrupts are better.
>
> My WRAP has been extremely reliable. No lockups ever and good
> performance.
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: "Max Cristin"
>   To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>   Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Hardware suggestion
>   Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:56:14 -0500
>
>
>   Beside the price difference, doesn't the same article you quoted
>   say that the performance issue was caused by a bug in an old
>   version and that it is now solved? Can anybody with a 4801 running
>   Mono 1.22 or 1.3b2 confirm or deny that? Thanks.
>
>   Max
>
>
>    
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>   To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>   For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch