|
||||||||||
Steve, et al. > "the issue that the 4801 shares interrupts > on the NICS. ... Separate interrupts are better. Does enabling 'polling' on the net4801's NIC's mitigate the shared IRQ issue you raise? Lonnie On Jan 27, 2007, at 2:31 PM, Steve Thomas wrote: > Well a driver bug in combination with the issue that the 4801 shares > interrupts > on the NICS. The shared interrupt part of that can't be fixed, and > bugs > can > re-appear sometimes. Separate interrupts are better. > > My WRAP has been extremely reliable. No lockups ever and good > performance. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Max Cristin" > To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Hardware suggestion > Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 12:56:14 -0500 > > > Beside the price difference, doesn't the same article you quoted > say that the performance issue was caused by a bug in an old > version and that it is now solved? Can anybody with a 4801 running > Mono 1.22 or 1.3b2 confirm or deny that? Thanks. > > Max > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch |