> Lee Sharp wrote:
>> Beau Woods wrote:
>>> Lee - I am using the wrap units because we already have them sitting
>>> So if I set it up so the <Wrap1 (at SBS server) (Lan 192.168.1.250)
>>> (Wireless 172.16.0.1)> <Wrap2 (Wireless 172.16.0.2) (Lan 192.168.2.250
>>> DHCP) then enable advanced outbound nat and create pass any/any/any
>>> rules on
>>> all interfaces, will this work? What static routes need to be in place?
>> Windows networking hates subnets. It just does not route well. Set
>> them up as switches. You might consider Damn Small Linux. That way
>> Windows doesn't get confused.
> By default it's not setup very well for a routed network. It is
> entirely possible to do so over a routed network, however.
It is possible to drive a nail with a Phillips screwdriver. I have even
done so. A hammer is just so much better. :)