krt wrote:
> Lee Sharp wrote:
>> Beau Woods wrote:

>>> Lee - I am using the wrap units because we already have them sitting 
>>> here.

>>> So if I set it up so the <Wrap1 (at SBS server) (Lan 192.168.1.250)
>>> (Wireless 172.16.0.1)>  <Wrap2 (Wireless 172.16.0.2) (Lan 192.168.2.250
>>> DHCP) then enable advanced outbound nat and create pass any/any/any 
>>> rules on
>>> all interfaces, will this work?  What static routes need to be in place?

>> Windows networking hates subnets.  It just does not route well.  Set 
>> them up as switches.  You might consider Damn Small Linux.  That way 
>> Windows doesn't get confused.

 > By default it's not setup very well for a routed network.  It is
 > entirely possible to do so over a routed network, however.

It is possible to drive a nail with a Phillips screwdriver.  I have even 
done so.  A hammer is just so much better. :)

			Lee