[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Beau Woods" <info at mazatecsolutions dot com dot au>
 To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] Extending factory network
 Date:  Sun, 11 Feb 2007 15:14:16 +1100
Hi I have uploaded a diagram to www.vicioustechnology.au.com/NETWORK.gif 
I need to leave the main network set the way it is if possible.

Thanks,
Beau

-----Original Message-----
From: Lee Sharp [mailto:leesharp at hal dash pc dot org] 
Sent: Sunday, 11 February 2007 2:28 PM
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Extending factory network

krt wrote:
> Lee Sharp wrote:
>> Beau Woods wrote:

>>> Lee - I am using the wrap units because we already have them sitting 
>>> here.

>>> So if I set it up so the <Wrap1 (at SBS server) (Lan 192.168.1.250)
>>> (Wireless 172.16.0.1)>  <Wrap2 (Wireless 172.16.0.2) (Lan 192.168.2.250
>>> DHCP) then enable advanced outbound nat and create pass any/any/any 
>>> rules on
>>> all interfaces, will this work?  What static routes need to be in place?

>> Windows networking hates subnets.  It just does not route well.  Set 
>> them up as switches.  You might consider Damn Small Linux.  That way 
>> Windows doesn't get confused.

 > By default it's not setup very well for a routed network.  It is
 > entirely possible to do so over a routed network, however.

It is possible to drive a nail with a Phillips screwdriver.  I have even 
done so.  A hammer is just so much better. :)

			Lee

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch



-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 10/02/2007
9:15 PM
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: 10/02/2007
9:15 PM