|
||||||||
Beau, This is surely an interesting puzzle... Is it true that WRAP2 has and empty WAN port? Could we be seeing a side effect of that in the LAN -> OPT1 routing in WRAP2? Grasping at straws. Lonnie On Feb 11, 2007, at 3:22 PM, Beau Woods wrote: > Hi all, > > I have managed to set this all up with one problem. I have set > <WRAP1 AP > LAN 192.168.1.2 and Bridged OPT1 to LAN> <WRAP2 BSS > WAN(Wireless)192.168.1.251 LAN 192.168.2.1>. I have enabled Advanced > outbound NAT and created ANY,ANY,ANY rules for all interfaces on > both boxes. > I made a static route on WRAP1 WAN to goto 192.168.2.0 gw > 192.168.1.251. > Now I can ping everything from WRAP1 including the computer on > WRAP2 however > I cannot ping WRAP1 from the computer on WRAP2 (I can ping WRAP1 > from WRAP2 > WAN interface but not the LAN interface). > > Any help please? > > Beau > > -----Original Message----- > From: Beau Woods [mailto:info at mazatecsolutions dot com dot au] > Sent: Sunday, 11 February 2007 3:14 PM > To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > Subject: RE: [m0n0wall] Extending factory network > > Hi I have uploaded a diagram to www.vicioustechnology.au.com/ > NETWORK.gif > I need to leave the main network set the way it is if possible. > > Thanks, > Beau > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lee Sharp [mailto:leesharp at hal dash pc dot org] > Sent: Sunday, 11 February 2007 2:28 PM > To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Extending factory network > > krt wrote: >> Lee Sharp wrote: >>> Beau Woods wrote: > >>>> Lee - I am using the wrap units because we already have them >>>> sitting >>>> here. > >>>> So if I set it up so the <Wrap1 (at SBS server) (Lan 192.168.1.250) >>>> (Wireless 172.16.0.1)> <Wrap2 (Wireless 172.16.0.2) (Lan >>>> 192.168.2.250 >>>> DHCP) then enable advanced outbound nat and create pass any/any/any >>>> rules on >>>> all interfaces, will this work? What static routes need to be >>>> in place? > >>> Windows networking hates subnets. It just does not route well. Set >>> them up as switches. You might consider Damn Small Linux. That way >>> Windows doesn't get confused. > >> By default it's not setup very well for a routed network. It is >> entirely possible to do so over a routed network, however. > > It is possible to drive a nail with a Phillips screwdriver. I have > even > done so. A hammer is just so much better. :) > > Lee > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: > 10/02/2007 > 9:15 PM > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.441 / Virus Database: 268.17.35/680 - Release Date: > 10/02/2007 > 9:15 PM > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > > |