Chris Bagnall wrote:
>
> So, a static route might for example be as follows:
> Network			GW
> 89.145.201.160/29	2.2.2.1
>
>
> Questions if I may:
>
> 1) Before I embarrass myself at a client's premises, would this actually
> work?
>   
yes
> 2) If yes, what interface would one specify in the static route? LAN or
> OPT1?
>   
you are telling the box on which interface it can see the hosts on 
89.145.201.160/29, so OPT1, unless I have a massive brain fart.
>
> Why am I trying to do this? Well, we have a few locations with 2 ADSL
> connections: an 8mb/832k for general net usage, and a slower 256/256 for
> VoIP (even a slow 256k connection can handle quite a few concurrent calls
> with g729 or iLBC)
>   
Should not be a problem with a static route, as long as you know that 
the target is not moving. :) just remember that ALL traffic to this 
network now goes through OPT1 rather than WAN, so if the hosts on 
89.145.201.160/29 are more than VOIP targets, you might end up with the 
wrong traffic there - as Lee said, in that case, you need to figure out 
a way to identify the VOIP traffic to route it through OPT1.

Sven