Adam Armstrong wrote:
> Pfsense + snort?
> AFAIK this is partly why pfsense exists, to do things the m0n0wall design
> brief doesn't allow :)
The snort package in PFsense still needs a bit of work. There are a few
minor bugs with it. Nothing that won't be worked out in time. Check out
the Pfsense list for info on that. And WOW... what a resource hog.