[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Mike <lists at southwestech dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] m0n0snort
 Date:  Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:51:23 -0600
Adam Armstrong wrote:
> Pfsense + snort?
> AFAIK this is partly why pfsense exists, to do things the m0n0wall design
> brief doesn't allow :)
> Adam.

The snort package in PFsense still needs a bit of work. There are a few 
minor bugs with it. Nothing that won't be worked out in time. Check out 
the Pfsense list for info on that. And WOW... what a resource hog.