[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  sai <sonicsai at gmail dot com>
 To:  "Jukka Ruotsalainen" <jukka dot ruotsalainen at cs dot helsinki dot fi>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] M0n0wall performance question
 Date:  Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:49:42 +0500
depends on the type of user.

mono has a state table of 30,000 sessions. Should be enough but some
p2p applications generate a huge number of sessions which would mess
up your internet access.

take a look at pfsense.com (its a fork of mono targetted at more
powerful machines) which allows you to change the size of the state
table.

sai


On 2/27/07, Jukka Ruotsalainen <jukka dot ruotsalainen at cs dot helsinki dot fi> wrote:
> Hello!
> Can m0n0wall handle constant traffic of 2000 concurrent users if it has
> 2 Ghz processor and 1 Gb ram.. WAN speed is abiut 50/50 Mb/s.
>
> Is m0n0wall using this efficently, is there any adjustems other like
>
> sysctl -w kern.ipc.somaxconn=32768 or tcp session timeout to be done?
>
> m0n0wall does also captive portal, nat and traffic shaping, www-traffic
> is most important.
>
> I have couple times experiences www-surfing slow down with 1.3b2
> version, specially if some other is using lot of badwith using p2p
> applications..
>
> Maybe some buffer or limit, can  these be increased?
>
> Mayby some performance optimized version of m0n0 should be done?
>
> Intended for more high power systems and lot of users.
>
> Jukka
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>