|
||||||||
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Thomas Serra <thomas dot serra at bluewin dot ch> Date: Mar 17, 2007 7:43 AM Subject: RE: Fwd: [m0n0wall] does m0n0wall support IPSec pass-through? To: apt dot get at gmail dot com Thank you! I'm not completely sure that NAT-T==IPSEC Pass-through, or if NAT-T allows IPSEC Pass-through. So 1.3b2 and supperior allows NAT-T, right? Do you think 1.3b2 is stable enough for prod env. ? In ou case : Firewall, VPN PPTP, and of course this NAT-T capability. Thank you. Thomas. The official answer is no, the beta version is not recommended for a production environment. However we've been using 1.3b1 and 1.3b2 since late December with ~200 users, pptp, traffic shaping, etc without a hitch. Be sure to use good stable hardware though to reduce the chance of having "issues". db ----Message d'origine---- De: apt dot get at gmail dot com Date: 17.03.2007 14:36 À: <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch> Objet: Fwd: [m0n0wall] does m0n0wall support IPSec pass-through? On 3/17/07, Thomas Serra <thomas dot serra at bluewin dot ch> wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm facing an IPSec pass-through issue. > > My question is the following: does m0n0wall support IPSec pass- > through? > > I couldn't find a definitive yes/no answer in the documentation. > > I really need to be sure of that as I need to integrate a machine > that's going to open an IPSEC connection from inside our LAN to an > external server. > > Our network is: > > -------[internet]----[ADSL modem – bridged]---[m0n0]------[LAN] > > > A machine from inside our LAN needs to open an IPSEC connection to > a company outside our small LAN: > > ------[other-company] -------[internet]----[ADSL modem – bridged] --- > [m0n0]------[LAN] > > Is that possible? > > Thank you in advance for help *Correction: NAT-T is currently only available in the latest beta version, 1.3b2. db |