|
||||||||||
Hi Roberto, While I'm no expert, I do have a rather elaborate shaper setup. I'm not sure if it all works, but believe I can feel the difference (my setup isn't as much about limiting bandwith, as prioritising certain things over other). To do what you want, I'd guess the following is needed (assuming your NAT and firewall rules are otherwise working with the shaper turned off): - 2 pipes, each allowing 64Kbit/s, NO mask. - 2 queues, NO mask, each using a separate pipe. - 2 rules (on the interface you want to limit, are you sure it is LAN you want, not WAN?) One rule for each direction, each a separate queue. If this doesn't work, try making the rules go directly to each of the two pipes instead, bypassing the queues (there have been some reports of queues not working properly?) Hope this helps? Make sure to post your results :) Adam. Roberto Pereyra wrote: > I again !!! > > My firewall rules are: > > WAN interface > (pass) Proto Source Port Destination Port Description > TCP * * 10.1.0.2 80 (HTTP) NAT > > LAN interface > (pass) Proto Source Port Destination Port Description > * LAN net * * * Default LAN -> any > > I must add another rule for traffic shapper in both ways ? > > roberto > > > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 08:09:27AM -0300, Roberto Pereyra wrote: > >>I again ! >> >>I have this shapper rule: >> >>LAN * 10.1.7.129 * * * 64 Kbit/s >>LAN * * * 10.1.7.129 * 64 Kbit/s >> >>I want to have 64kbit/s in both ways. >> >>It's this setup rigth ? When I test this setup, (with my ftp server) the download bandwidth is like 10Kbit/s. >> >>Thanks for any help. >> >>roberto >> >> >> >> >>On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 07:43:31AM -0300, Roberto Pereyra wrote: >> >>>A question about this subject. >>> >>>I need for enable traffic shapper, enable "advance outbound NAT" or works well >>>with the default NAT setup. >>> >>>Thanks again. >>> >>>roberto >>> >>> >>> >>>On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:38:17PM -0300, Roberto Pereyra wrote: >>> >>>>Hi all ! >>>>A question ? Traffic shapper works well in pb21r560 ? >>>> >>>>I have troubles with it because not limit well the bandwidth. >>>> >>>>thanks in advance >>>> >>>>roberto >>>> >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch >>>> >>> >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch >>>For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch >>> >> >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch >>For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > |