[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Adam Nellemann <adam at nellemann dot nu>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Bug or Feature request.....
 Date:  Mon, 09 Feb 2004 01:09:58 +0100
Just a thought...

Lasse Österberg wrote:

> When adding the "high" port range (1024-65535) to a firewall rule it would
> be nice to have it available in the dropdown list as "High ports".

If adding the above, why not also provide an "Any" choice here? (For 
people running seperate firewalls on their servers etc.)

If "Any" or "*" is not directly supported by the underlying NAT 
system, the validation code could simply replace it with 1-65535.