[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "David Burgess" <apt dot get at gmail dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Fwd: [m0n0wall] possible to do M0n0 on a ATMEL 32-bit AVR?
 Date:  Mon, 9 Apr 2007 13:14:45 -0600
Sorry, this was meant for the list.

db

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Burgess <apt dot get at gmail dot com>
Date: Apr 9, 2007 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] possible to do M0n0 on a ATMEL 32-bit AVR?
To: Paul Taylor <PaulTaylor at winn dash dixie dot com>

On 4/9/07, Paul Taylor <PaulTaylor at winn dash dixie dot com> wrote:
>
> Ok, Everybody - Say it with me:
>
> Monowall's not Linux...
>
> :)
>
> It's a common misconception, but Monowall actually runs on FreeBSD.
> Version 1.2x and below are based on FreeBSD 4.11 and version 1.3 (now in
> beta) is based on FreeBSD 6.
>
> With that said, it may work on this box if it's running with an x86
> series processor.  If it uses a different architecture, though, Monowall
> definitely won't work on it.
>
> Paul
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Staph [mailto:rstaph at digitalimpreza dot com]
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 1:30 PM
> To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: [m0n0wall] possible to do M0n0 on a ATMEL 32-bit AVR?
>
> Its already got linux, think there is a way to port m0n0 for a nice
> simple 2
> interface, cheap, router?
>
> http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/view_detail.asp?FileName=AVR32NGKit_3_
> 26.html&family_id=682
>



I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, like maybe he meant, "gee, if
this thing works for linux, then maybe the BSD people are onto this
hardware as well".

db