|
||||||||
On 4/29/07, Alex Neuman van der Hans <alex at nkpanama dot com> wrote: > > I'm not looking to push wire-speed, since the only "true" 100mbps link > would be the main network. The other 7 would be remote offices that are > accessible by a point-to-point link that ends up in the server room as > an RJ45 ethernet connection (so I don't have to care what the "two tin > cans and a piece of string" look like on the service provider's side) - > and the top speed on any one of them is 2mbps. > Ah, that's not bad at all then. With that many interfaces, I would still make sure you have a 500 MHz machine minimum. > What good 4-port nics would be recommendable? > Lots of discussion on this in the past, and several models people are successfully using. http://www.google.com/search?q=quad+port+nic+site%3Am0n0.ch Only one I've personally used is the quad Intel Pro/1000 cards, which is overkill for your situation as you can probably find something a lot cheaper. You may need to split this off into two installs, if you can't get 9 ports detected and working on one box. Given your setup, that should be easy. -Chris |