[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Neil A. Hillard" <m0n0 at dana dot org dot uk>
 To:  daniele dot guazzoni at gcomm dot ch
 Cc:  m0n0wall <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Multiple NICS on Lan Side
 Date:  Wed, 4 Jul 2007 00:15:56 +0100
Hi,

In message <468AD5AE dot 10206 at gcomm dot ch>, Daniele Guazzoni
<daniele dot guazzoni at gcomm dot ch> writes
>That doesn't work.
>What you could do (but I do not recommend it) is to subnet on several NICs.
>You can then have 192.168.1.0/24 on one, 192.168.1.16/29 on another, ...
>This would work as the subnets are more specific but it can create the
>big mess if you use the same address on both NICs (as they overlap for
>each subnet).

I guess you meant /29 on the 192.168.1.0!


                                Neil.

>
>What exactly do you plan to do ?
>
>
>Daniele
>
>Richard StClair wrote:
>> Hi,
>>  Soekris 4501 with MW 1.3b2.
>>  WAN eth0    192.168.1.0/24 with an IP of 192.168.1.200
>>  LAN eth1    192.168.2.0/24 with an IP of 192.168.2.200    Works
>>Great.
>>  Shouldn't I be able to add:
>>  opt1     eth2    192.168.2.201/24 in same subnet as the LAN on eth1?
>>  I've tried it and can't get anything to route through it.
>>  I've done the firewall rules for opt1.
>>  I think it should just work.
>>  If I change opt1 to a separate subnet like 192.168.3.0/24 then it
>>all  comes right and works.
>>  Does every nic have to be on a separate subnet to work?
>>  I want to be able to add IPs to each nic and have them all on the
>>same  subnet on the lan side.
>>  Am I trying to do something that can't be done?
>>
>
>--
>
>
>regards
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------
>Daniele Guazzoni
>Senior Network Engineer, CCNP, CCNA
>
>
>Linux and AMD-x86_64 or do you still with Windows and Intel ?
>

-- 
Neil A. Hillard                E-Mail:   m0n0 at dana dot org dot uk