Well, why not set all access points in the same subnet and connect them to one NIC ?


Richard StClair wrote:
>> That doesn't work.
>> What you could do (but I do not recommend it) is to subnet on several 
>> NICs.
>> You can then have 192.168.1.0/24 on one, 192.168.1.16/29 on another, ...
>> This would work as the subnets are more specific but it can create the 
>> big mess if you use the same address on both NICs (as they overlap for 
>> each subnet).
>>
>> What exactly do you plan to do ?
> 
> What I'm trying to do is run multiple wifi access points behind one 
> captive portal using mac passthrough in monowall. One radio in the 
> Soekris, and the others on eth1.
> 
> If I bridge opt1 to lan then I can't use captive portal....
> 
> Or at least I think so.
> 
> Cheers
> Rich
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
> 

-- 


regards


-------------------------------------------------------------
Daniele Guazzoni
Senior Network Engineer, CCNP, CCNA


Linux and AMD-x86_64 or do you still with Windows and Intel ?

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailGate, and is
believed to be clean.