|
||||||||
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lee Sharp wrote: > Peter Boosten wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I must have missed the big picture, but what does IP Administration have >> in common with a firewall? > > Most people with firewalls use IP addresses. Many of those are managed > by the firewall. Some management solutions integrate with some > firewalls. And there is a common interest for many users. I am sure a > better solution will soon shake out, and after a few "This works" posts > it will drop off. Yes, I can see the convience that would give. It's my believes however that a firewall should only do what it's for: keep the bad traffic out. I can even live with a DHCP server on board, since m0n0 (which I love btw) is used in a SOHO environment as well. But those aren't exactly the places where one would suspect an IP Administration tool. IPAM is for large(r) environments, and the more functionality you push into a firewall, the more vulnerable your organisation gets whenever it has been compromised. > > However the best reason is that this list is one of the best collection > of knowledgeable technical professionals anywhere. An occasional off > topic post can lead to some very good software. This list has actually > pointed me at two projects I am now actively involved in, AimSniff and > zoneminder. (Also several other cool things I don't actively > participate in) I can see the advantages of this argument, and I'm following this thread with great pleasure. I was merely reacting on the fact that m0n0wall should get IPAM functionality. Peter - -- http://www.boosten.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGu0KKrvsez6l/SvARAvCYAJ95fsffo6yZkGjNoMoQL1N9UiwtnACcDqC4 gk1yId6W0wW76dMaWbh2CoI= =mSMa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |