[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Christopher M. Iarocci" <iarocci at eastendsc dot com>
 To:  "Wells, Markus" <Markus dot Wells at sonosite dot com>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Hello all - new here
 Date:  Tue, 18 Sep 2007 19:39:06 -0400
Wells, Markus wrote:
>  Ok thanks guys! We just tried enabling advanced outbound NAT but when
> we did, suddenly outbound DNS lookups seemed to fail.
>
>  Any ideas?
>
> Thanks you!
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee Sharp [mailto:leesharp at hal dash pc dot org] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 1:37 PM
> To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] Hello all - new here
>
> Wells, Markus wrote:
>   
>>  I just wanted to say hello and that I really dig monowall. It a great
>> firewall..
>>
>>  
>>
>>  I do have a quick question - 
>>
>>  
>>
>>  We have a mail server behind monowall and we want it's traffic to
>> appear to come from a different WAN ip than the rest of our natted
>> traffic. We already have a proxy arp entry for the ip in question, I
>> just need to know what kind of rule to put in place so that the
>>     
> traffic
>   
>> from the mail server and ONLY from the mail server is natted through
>> this other ip. 
>>     
>
> Server NAT is the easiest way to go.  You will have to define firewall 
> rules as well.
>
> 			Lee
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>
>   
Read the posts again.  They said to use "SERVER NAT", not advanced 
outbound NAT.