[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Rhon-Kaniel Bramwell" <rhonkaniel at anngel dot com>
 To:  "'Chris Flugstad'" <chris at cascadelink dot com>, "'David Burgess'" <apt dot get at gmail dot com>
 Cc:  <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] 2 interfaces captive portal
 Date:  Tue, 4 Dec 2007 13:12:14 -0500
I had asked about this some time back as well.... If there are any solutions
to this id be eternally grateful... I had a wireless network and a wired
network that I wanted to do captive portal on, I eventually ended up having
to get a separate wireless bridge and bridge the wireless network to the
wired network and run the captive portal only on the wireless network.



-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Flugstad [mailto:chris at cascadelink dot com] 
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 10:04 PM
To: David Burgess
Cc: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] 2 interfaces captive portal


I'd buy a switch, but both of these interfaces are wireless cards on the
board.  I have some areas' where my m0n0wall's have 2 seperate ap's
tethered to it.  Im trying to minimize hardware and have the m0n0 do as
much functions as possible, as well reduce hardware costs, size, power

If anyone knows a workaround or config to having 2 wireless nics on the
board/m0n0 both go through captive portal, that would rock.

Chris Flugstad

On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 21:18 -0700, David Burgess wrote:
> On Nov 15, 2007 9:32 PM, Lee Sharp <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org> wrote:
> > Chris Flugstad wrote:
> > > anyone used 2 interfaces on a captive portal?
> > >
> > > i have 2 radios and want both of them to use the portal/page
> >
> > Can't do it.  CP will only work on one interface.  Buy a switch.
> And in case you're planning to have any bridged interface on your mono,
> CP will not work at all.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch

__________ NOD32 2701 (20071204) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.