|
||||||||
I've got it working, thanks !! Now, I also have a SIP solution which has a fixed IP in my LAN1. I see that traffic shaper is a solution to limit my bandwidth... but can it also be used to guarantee a certain bandwidth ? I tried several things, but it doesn't seem to fit into my ruleset, or I did a mistake. I now can use the captive portal for people I don't trust (or don't want to trust), and that's a good thing :) Too bad that my WLAN USB dongle is fitted onto a 1.1 USB port, it wont go faster than 750kbit... which is enough for occasional use ofcourse :) Michael Brown schreef: > Hi, > If they are on a separate LAN segment, but you both share the same > gateway out to the Internet, Traffic Shaping is the easiest way to go. > It's not that you have to create any fancy rules, just create two > pipes, one for upload, one for download and use a traffic shaping rule > that anything coming from LAN2 will be assigned to those pipes. Since > the entire LAN2 will be assigned the pipes, they will share whatever > max you set. > > That's really what the Traffic Shaping section is about, so there > isn't really any other way that would be easiest in my opinion. I know > it would take about 2 minutes top to setup those rules and you can > modify them at anytime and it will instantly if you feel they need > more/less bandwidth. > > Thanks, > Michael > > Michel Servaes wrote: >> Beta 1.3b8 - Installed, rebooted and running on a Pentium III-600E(B) >> MHz cpu / 384MB RAM (with an 512MB CF/IDE card - I know that I only >> need 8MB, but I don't have anything smaller) >> >> Another question though, I have a setup with two LAN cards and one >> WAN card. >> My second LAN card is to allow my neighbours on the internet (via an >> AP connected to the LAN2 (OPT1)) >> >> Is there a way (without having to go through Traffic Shaper) to limit >> their bandwidth in a fashionable way ?? >> Currently I am using CARP for LAN2, made them authenticate one time >> (so I could assign the MAC addresses so they don't have to >> authenticate no more)... and in CARP I could limit their bandwidth to >> 512K down and 128K up. >> >> It is a solution, but I guess other people here might find it useful >> to have it in somekind of setup option on the LAN cards themselves, >> some kind of bandwidth limitation... because when using pipes I >> myself cannot go higher than the pipe I created (and I read that one >> should create pipes to only the maximum that is available to you) >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch > |