|
||||||||||
That's true. I don't see the initial problem? Is port probing an issue at all? The firewall does it's job. Harald Sauff wrote: > That would be very risky. IP spoofing is nothing new, and especially for > UDP it's very easy. Would be pretty bad when your m0n0wall suddenly > blocks all responses from your DNS server because someone spoofed its > address... Gives a nice Denial of Service attack. > > And about IDS: > It's "Intrusion *Detection* System", it doesn't necessarily *do* > anything but report about the incident. If it *does* something when > detecting an attack it would be an intrusion prevention system or an > intrusion reaction system. > > > greetings, > Harry > > Michel Servaes wrote: >> that indeed would be a far much better approach... >> isn't that what IDS is about ? >> >> Dennis Karlsson schreef: >>> Wouldn't it be better if the firewall blocked all requests from that >>> IP for X minutes instead? >>> >>> >>> Michel Servaes wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Would it be possible to change IP (automatically) when the firewall >>>> notices a possible breach ? >>>> Today I noticed in my log, multiple tries to several ports (known to >>>> be ports of other firewalls)... 3128, 8000, 8080, 8088, 8888 (they >>>> all originate from the same ip) > > |