Chad R. Larson wrote:
> We've been kicking the idea around. We use vrrp between a pair of FreeBSD
> based web servers. The amount of multicast traffic for heartbeats is a bit
> of an annoyance, but otherwise just fine.
>
> On the other hand, if running m0n0wall on something like a net4801 (which
> has no moving parts, not even a fan) you might want to consider the MTBF of
> the box against the additional complexity. And remember, if you have two
> firewall boxes, you have twice the chance of a failure.
Given the reliability of the hardware is there much value in a vrrp
configuration that doesn't support stateful failover? |