On Mar 14, 2008, at 7:18 AM, Alex M wrote:
> WDS is the way of bridging between APs so CP will work if you
> connect your
> primary (Master) AP to CP Interface and all the rest Slave Repeaters
> use master as the source of Inet connection.
No, WDS is the common name for the 4 address frame format where you
can set "FromDS" and "ToDS" and have devices behind one STA (be it AP
or client) through another, and on to a 'ditribution medium'.
> However if you want to use mono's wireless interface and connect
> your AP to
> that interface in WDM mode, then it may work or not it just depends
> on your
> APs. For us we never even considering trying that because majority
> of AP
> makes use proprietary bridging (and WDM) things, they all similar
> but some
> of them just refuse to tallk to other makes, so its better to do WDM
> in same
> brand ewuipment.
Actually, interoperability between APs is pretty good. The Broadcom
(think linksys wrt54 series and similar) stuff got such huge market
share that the other chipset manufacturers ended up using the wrt54
series as the 'reference implementation'.
However, FreeBSD does not (yet) support WDS. Support is in Sam
Leffler's p4 tree, but the driver doesn't work against all supported
cards (just Atheros), so he hasn't released it into HEAD.
> If you still need to do WDM on multi make APs that just set up one
> or 2 APs
> as repeaters, that gona do the same as some cheap APs call WDM ex:
> Senao WDM
> is just plain repeater
WDM? Whats that?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luke Fahey [mailto:luke at advance dot on dot net]
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 4:26 AM
> To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: [m0n0wall] Wireless WDS
> Hi All
> Just wondering is there any chance that monowall supports WDS . We
> a few access points in one location and we are hoping to control them
> with the monowall captive portal.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch