On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Chris Severance
<severach at users dot sourceforge dot net> wrote:
>  Eventually this runs into the problem where you get a collision of RFC
>  1918 subnets and you can't change them. The solution is to map the
>  private IPs to public IPs and form an IPSec VPN between the public IP
>  addresses. A large company with many VPNs will have already done this
>  and using public IPs will be a matter of policy.
....
> vpn192.168.0.10::peer1.1.1.1 <-> peer2.2.2.2::vpn2.2.2.3

The other problem here is that if the remote side has a large number
of VPN's, they will likely have numerous peers using 192.168.1.0/24 or
similar, so they will require you to use source-NAT over the tunnel,
which m0n0wall does not support.

I would have been trying to configure the type of tunnel you are
describing if it weren't for the NAT problem. I ended up purchasing a
Cisco ASA.

JR