[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Tim Nelson <tnelson at rockbochs dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] SMB over IPSEC...
 Date:  Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:47:59 -0500 (CDT)
Actual bandwidth between sites is very good at about 1mbit and latency is around 100ms. FTP traffic
through the IPSEC tunnel hits at least 700k or so...

Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Sharp" <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org>
To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:32:27 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] SMB over IPSEC...

Tim Nelson wrote:
> They are able to find the server and access it's shares but opening a file... even small ones like
20k... takes FOREVER.

Sniff the link...  SMB is a noisy and inefficient protocol.  You fixed 
the name resolution, which is a problem for Windows on any routed 
network, but you can't fix the bandwidth.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch