[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Lonnie Abelbeck <lists at lonnie dot abelbeck dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall List <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Cc:  Manuel Kasper <mk at neon1 dot net>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Beta 1.3b14 released
 Date:  Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:38:48 -0500
On Aug 24, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Manuel Kasper wrote:

> On 24.08.2008, at 01:04, Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>> Your "Choose your platform" Soekris Engineering net55xx points to  
>> the 'embedded' version.
>> I have been using generic-pc in the past.
>> Should I rename the embedded-1.3b14.img to generic-pc-1.3b14.img  
>> before upgrading my current net5501?
> Yes. To be honest - I haven't actually tried the embedded image on a  
> net5501 (just on all other Soekris and PC Engines boards), as I  
> don't have one, so you may not want to do this on an important box  
> in a remote place. :)
> If somebody has already done it, it would be nice to get  
> confirmation that the embedded image actually works fine on a  
> net5501 (I don't see any reason why it shouldn't, though).


I gave it try, and the embedded image seems to support the net5501,  
the Platform: information under Status is correct.

But dummy me, I have an Intel PRO 1000 GT installed in the net5501,  
and the embedded image does not appear to include the em drivers.

No problem I thought, I did the reverse trick, downloaded the generic- 
pc image, renamed it embedded-1.3b14.img, but now the new embedded  
firmware does not accept the disguised firmware, saying the firmware  
is not for the embedded platform.

Do I have any other option than re-flashing the CF with the generic-pc