[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "David Burgess" <apt dot get at gmail dot com>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] A route to this destination network already exists
 Date:  Sat, 6 Dec 2008 00:52:12 -0700
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Michael Pope <spotnruby at gmail dot com> wrote:

> Name Interface Interface_IP Newtork
> LAN sis0 192.168.165.1 192.168.165.0/24
> WAN sis1 x.x.x.x x.x.x.x/xx
> Unmanaged sis2 192.168.50.1 192.168.50.0/24
> Phone VLAN 2 on sis0 10.10.16.2 10.10.16.0/24

> Static Routes
> Interface Network Gateway
> LAN 10.10.16.0/24 192.168.165.31

If I'm reading you correctly, your Phone interface is IP 10.10.16.2
netmask 255.255.255.0
Then you set up a static route for network 10.10.16.0/24 with gateway
192.168.165.31, which is on your LAN interface. So you're telling your
router that network 10.10.16.0/24 is on Phone interface, but also that
this same network is accessed through another interface. Is not this
why you're getting a 'network exists' error? These two settings
contradict each other, methinks.

db