[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Lee Sharp <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] comparison
 Date:  Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:07:40 -0600
Marco Lingen wrote:
> It wil be used for a star-topology network with 10 sites connected.
> Right now we are using a zywall 70 with zywall 35's on the site's on a 10Mb internet line will be
25Mb in the near future.
> When the throughput is about 5-6Mb the Zywall 70 has a processor utilization between 60-90% and
losing connections.
> But according to the specs the zywall 70 can do 50Mb hmm.. thats why i'm asking for the max values
to compare to the newer zywall or sonicwall's
> But i found that the ZyWall USG 1050 is using only a celeron 1,6Mhz processor with 512Mb ram and
cost a lot.
> The P4 2,8 second hand ex lease pc cost me about â¬70,-- and stil i have to convince my boss
about stability, maximum performance and proven technology of monowall.

Feel free to have him shoot me an e-mail.  We are using it 
professionally in about 75 locations.  It is a core of our business.