[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Egbert Jan van den Bussche" <egbert at vandenbussche dot nl>
 To:  "'Michel Servaes'" <michel at mcmc dot be>
 Cc:  "'Steve Bertrand'" <steve at ibctech dot ca>, <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] how do we check, that ipv6 is actually working (OT again)
 Date:  Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:13:39 +0200
Is there typo in here? Is it really ::1f14::???? Or 1f15

EJ 

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Michel Servaes [mailto:michel at mcmc dot be] 
> Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2009 23:12
> Aan: Egbert Jan van den Bussche
> CC: 'Steve Bertrand'; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Onderwerp: Re: [m0n0wall] how do we check, that ipv6 is 
> actually working (OT again)
> 
> 
> Egbert Jan, Steve,
> 
> 
> I was fiddling a bit more, and now it seems I broke it again 
> :'( I received following details from the tunnel broker :
> 
> * server IPv4 address : 216.66.84.46
> * server IPv6 address : 2001:470:1f14:158c::1/64
> * client IPv4 address : 84.194.206.201
> * client IPv6 address : 2001:470:1f14:158c::2/64
> 
> * Routed /48 : 2001:470:d39d::/48
> * Routed /64 : 2001:470:1f15:158c::/64
> 
> 
> I am still thinking IPv4... so it might just be that I try to 
> do NAT'ing 
> anyway ??
> 
> 
> In monowall I have now following setup ;
> 
> WAN
> * WAN : ipv6 enabled, tunnel mode
> * WAN IPv6 address : 2001:470:1f15:158c::/64
> * Send IPv6 RA
> * IPv6 tunnel : 216.66.84.46
> 
> LAN
> * IPv6 mode : static
> * IPv6 address : 2001:470:d39d:1::1 /64
> * Send RA router advertisements active
> 
> 
> Damned ( with a smile ), I had it working for internal to external- I 
> just wanted it reversed as well...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Egbert Jan van den Bussche schreef:
> > Michel, did the tunnel brooker give you a specific address? I would 
> > expect that they told you to configure 
> 2001:470:1f15:158c::1 or 2 on 
> > your WAN interface. I tried pinging those but they do not respond.
> >
> > On my Monowall:
> > traceroute6 to 2001:470:1f15:158c::2 (2001:470:1f15:158c::2) from 
> > 2a02:968:1000:3::2, 18 hops max, 12 byte packets  1  
> > 2a02:968:1000:3::1  12.033 ms  11.339 ms  11.826 ms (My WAN port 
> > tunnel
> > address)
> >  2  gateway-bit-vlan-45.hobby.nl  12.387 ms  13.297 ms  12.584 ms
> >  3  815.xe-1-0-0.jun1.kelvin.network.bit.nl  12.650 ms  
> 12.612 ms  11.879 ms
> >  4  linx.he.net  20.282 ms  20.906 ms  20.184 ms
> >  5  10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.ams1.he.net  21.084 ms  
> 25.753 ms  25.129 ms
> >  6  1g-bge0.tserv11.ams1.ipv6.he.net  24.043 ms  23.408 ms  
> 23.378 ms
> >  7  * * *
> >
> > This stops earlier than I expected. There seems no route to Michels 
> > tunnelnetwork...
> >
> > EJ
> >
> >   
> >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> >> Van: Steve Bertrand [mailto:steve at ibctech dot ca]
> >> Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2009 22:39
> >> Aan: Michel Servaes
> >> CC: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch >> M0n0wall Mailing List
> >> Onderwerp: Re: [m0n0wall] how do we check, that ipv6 is 
> >> actually working (OT again)
> >>
> >>
> >> Michel Servaes wrote:
> >>     
> >>>          Routed /48:       2001:470:d39d::/48
> >>>     Routed /64:     2001:470:1f15:158c::/64
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> This is the config, I got from tunnelbroker.net
> >>> But I have not configured the routed /48 part on my side at
> >>>       
> >> all. (the
> >>     
> >>> /48 part was optional at tunnelbroker.net)
> >>>       
> >> Ok. This tells me that you have the m0n0wall NAT'ing IPv6 then.
> >>
> >> Does the m0n0 have the capability to route IPv6 between the
> >> LAN interface and the tunnel interface?
> >>
> >> If your WAN (tunnel) interface is:
> >>
> >> 2001:470:1f15:158c::/64
> >>
> >> Then as a test, assign:
> >>
> >> 2001:470:d39d:1::1/64 to the LAN interface, and configure a PC 
> >> within:
> >>
> >> 2001:470:d39d:1::/64
> >>
> >> I don't have any m0n0walls in use right now, so unfortunately
> >> I can't provide any assistance with it's configuration.
> >>
> >>     
> >>> I'll try to setup Sixxs again, since they have a Windows
> >>>       
> >> Client too -
> >>     
> >>> that way I can try in between the office, and my home. At
> >>>       
> >> the office I
> >>     
> >>> don't have a monowall yet (have to wait 60 days, before I start
> >>> working there :)  - and am not going to do experiments at 
> >>>       
> >> my current
> >>     
> >>> job)
> >>>       
> >> Ahhh, I see...
> >>
> >>     
> >>> Thank you for your testing though... but since I'm
> >>>       
> >> completely new to
> >>     
> >>> ipv6, I don't want to take your time too much ;)
> >>>       
> >> Not a problem at all... if you were taking too much of my
> >> time, you would know this by a lack of response ;)
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> >>
> >>
> >>     
> >
> >   
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
>