[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Michel Servaes <michel at mcmc dot be>
 To:  Egbert Jan van den Bussche <egbert at vandenbussche dot nl>
 Cc:  'Steve Bertrand' <steve at ibctech dot ca>, m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] how do we check, that ipv6 is actually working (OT again)
 Date:  Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:15:13 +0200
It is ::1f14::
Only at the routed part, I read ::1f15::

What's special about 1f14, since you put as many ?? :)

Egbert Jan van den Bussche schreef:
> Is there typo in here? Is it really ::1f14::???? Or 1f15
>
> EJ 
>
>   
>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>> Van: Michel Servaes [mailto:michel at mcmc dot be] 
>> Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2009 23:12
>> Aan: Egbert Jan van den Bussche
>> CC: 'Steve Bertrand'; m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>> Onderwerp: Re: [m0n0wall] how do we check, that ipv6 is 
>> actually working (OT again)
>>
>>
>> Egbert Jan, Steve,
>>
>>
>> I was fiddling a bit more, and now it seems I broke it again 
>> :'( I received following details from the tunnel broker :
>>
>> * server IPv4 address : 216.66.84.46
>> * server IPv6 address : 2001:470:1f14:158c::1/64
>> * client IPv4 address : 84.194.206.201
>> * client IPv6 address : 2001:470:1f14:158c::2/64
>>
>> * Routed /48 : 2001:470:d39d::/48
>> * Routed /64 : 2001:470:1f15:158c::/64
>>
>>
>> I am still thinking IPv4... so it might just be that I try to 
>> do NAT'ing 
>> anyway ??
>>
>>
>> In monowall I have now following setup ;
>>
>> WAN
>> * WAN : ipv6 enabled, tunnel mode
>> * WAN IPv6 address : 2001:470:1f15:158c::/64
>> * Send IPv6 RA
>> * IPv6 tunnel : 216.66.84.46
>>
>> LAN
>> * IPv6 mode : static
>> * IPv6 address : 2001:470:d39d:1::1 /64
>> * Send RA router advertisements active
>>
>>
>> Damned ( with a smile ), I had it working for internal to external- I 
>> just wanted it reversed as well...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Egbert Jan van den Bussche schreef:
>>     
>>> Michel, did the tunnel brooker give you a specific address? I would 
>>> expect that they told you to configure 
>>>       
>> 2001:470:1f15:158c::1 or 2 on 
>>     
>>> your WAN interface. I tried pinging those but they do not respond.
>>>
>>> On my Monowall:
>>> traceroute6 to 2001:470:1f15:158c::2 (2001:470:1f15:158c::2) from 
>>> 2a02:968:1000:3::2, 18 hops max, 12 byte packets  1  
>>> 2a02:968:1000:3::1  12.033 ms  11.339 ms  11.826 ms (My WAN port 
>>> tunnel
>>> address)
>>>  2  gateway-bit-vlan-45.hobby.nl  12.387 ms  13.297 ms  12.584 ms
>>>  3  815.xe-1-0-0.jun1.kelvin.network.bit.nl  12.650 ms  
>>>       
>> 12.612 ms  11.879 ms
>>     
>>>  4  linx.he.net  20.282 ms  20.906 ms  20.184 ms
>>>  5  10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.ams1.he.net  21.084 ms  
>>>       
>> 25.753 ms  25.129 ms
>>     
>>>  6  1g-bge0.tserv11.ams1.ipv6.he.net  24.043 ms  23.408 ms  
>>>       
>> 23.378 ms
>>     
>>>  7  * * *
>>>
>>> This stops earlier than I expected. There seems no route to Michels 
>>> tunnelnetwork...
>>>
>>> EJ
>>>
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
>>>> Van: Steve Bertrand [mailto:steve at ibctech dot ca]
>>>> Verzonden: dinsdag 14 april 2009 22:39
>>>> Aan: Michel Servaes
>>>> CC: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch >> M0n0wall Mailing List
>>>> Onderwerp: Re: [m0n0wall] how do we check, that ipv6 is 
>>>> actually working (OT again)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Michel Servaes wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>>          Routed /48:       2001:470:d39d::/48
>>>>>     Routed /64:     2001:470:1f15:158c::/64
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the config, I got from tunnelbroker.net
>>>>> But I have not configured the routed /48 part on my side at
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> all. (the
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> /48 part was optional at tunnelbroker.net)
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Ok. This tells me that you have the m0n0wall NAT'ing IPv6 then.
>>>>
>>>> Does the m0n0 have the capability to route IPv6 between the
>>>> LAN interface and the tunnel interface?
>>>>
>>>> If your WAN (tunnel) interface is:
>>>>
>>>> 2001:470:1f15:158c::/64
>>>>
>>>> Then as a test, assign:
>>>>
>>>> 2001:470:d39d:1::1/64 to the LAN interface, and configure a PC 
>>>> within:
>>>>
>>>> 2001:470:d39d:1::/64
>>>>
>>>> I don't have any m0n0walls in use right now, so unfortunately
>>>> I can't provide any assistance with it's configuration.
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> I'll try to setup Sixxs again, since they have a Windows
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Client too -
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> that way I can try in between the office, and my home. At
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> the office I
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> don't have a monowall yet (have to wait 60 days, before I start
>>>>> working there :)  - and am not going to do experiments at 
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> my current
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> job)
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Ahhh, I see...
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> Thank you for your testing though... but since I'm
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> completely new to
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> ipv6, I don't want to take your time too much ;)
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Not a problem at all... if you were taking too much of my
>>>> time, you would know this by a lack of response ;)
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>   
>>>       
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>>
>>
>>     
>
>