[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  YvesDM <ydmlog at gmail dot com>
 To:  "m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch" <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Wireless Intel 2200BG & Atheros AR9220 not reconized
 Date:  Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:28:57 +0200
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Lee Sharp <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org> wrote:

> YvesDM wrote:
>
>  Aha, that's good news.
>> I remember we discussed EnGenius/ Senao trouble before.
>> Good to hear EnGenius finally listened to the grief of many people and did
>> something about the crappy hardware they used to use in the past.
>> According your positive experience with them now, I might try them too one
>> day soon.
>>
>
> I have to tell you about this one!  I finally got on the phone with a
> developer and a tester.  We were talking about all my failed 3220s, and how
> the 3610s were seeming to be better.
>
> I said, "On the 3220 I will loose 8 out of 10 in the first year, and have a
> 1 in 10 DOA.  So far I have had only 1 DOA 3610, and that is much better!"
>
> <shock> "But 1 is too many."
>
> I reply, "Out of about 50, I am happy so far."
>
> <silence>  "50?"
>
> Now they are occasionally shipping us beta product to evaluate.  :) Some
> have had heat issues, but most have been better.  All the released stuff I
> have seen has been solid so far.  (Other than the 3320)
>
>
>                        Lee
>


Funny,

I got + 500 Linksys WRT54GL in use.
Maybe I should contact them too, they might offer an alternative :-)