[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  =?windows-1252?Q?Sa=9Aa_Stjepan_Bak=9Aa?= <sasa dash stjepan dot baksa at os dot t dash com dot hr>
 To:  "m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch" <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] log visited sites of captive portal users.
 Date:  Sun, 03 May 2009 11:11:30 +0200
If that is necessary, why not? Yes, I know, it is more expensive than 
single box but with today's
small footprint appliance machines with laptop size hard discs it is 
easier done than i the past.

With combination of Free-Radius, MYSQL and  Open LDAP miracles can be 
done. Using
M0n0/pfSense frame-work it can even be done in a friendly way with web 
front ends and so on.

Don't be mistaken. I am not the one who will vote in favor of that kinda 
law. My country is
outside EU and will be that way for few years more but if we join EU 
there be more restrictive
laws for which we will bend our collective spine :-( When that time come 
we must be prepared
with good solutions for our customers. In another hand, I just don't see 
how will plain user with
wireless router for his/hers home accomplish any kind of logging - 
especially in duration of 3 years.


YvesDM wrote:
> 2009/5/1 Saša Stjepan Bakša <sasa dash stjepan dot baksa at os dot t dash com dot hr>
>> Squid or Squid like software is the best deal. Squid can authenticate
>> against the same radius which you
>> use to authenticate your hotspot users. Logs can then been transfered to
>> database (mysql, postgres, name-your-poison)
>> where we can with "simple" SQl query's search trough saved data. Yes, I
>> know that require more firepower but
>> either that or lobbying against the stupid low.
>> Sasa
> You mean set up a squid box on every location?