Re: [m0n0wall] captive portal on multiple interfaces

From:	Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>
Cc:	m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject:	Re: [m0n0wall] captive portal on multiple interfaces
Date:	Wed, 20 May 2009 18:04:13 -0400

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Lee Sharp <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org> wrote:
> Jonathan De Graeve - M0n0wall wrote:
>>
>> Very simple,
>>
>> Our current CP structure is not yet up for it. We first have to migrate to
>> a new 'storage' container for the CP information.
>>
>> I don't think multiple interfaces will be there soon, nor is it a
>> requirement if you use it in a routed environment.
>
> Would this fix the "No CP and bridge on the same box" problem?  I am running
> into that one now, quite a bit.
>

Unlikely, that's because the user has to be directed to a portal site
of some sort and bridged setups don't have IPs on the bridge.