[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] captive portal on multiple interfaces
 Date:  Wed, 20 May 2009 18:04:13 -0400
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Lee Sharp <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org> wrote:
> Jonathan De Graeve - M0n0wall wrote:
>> Very simple,
>> Our current CP structure is not yet up for it. We first have to migrate to
>> a new 'storage' container for the CP information.
>> I don't think multiple interfaces will be there soon, nor is it a
>> requirement if you use it in a routed environment.
> Would this fix the "No CP and bridge on the same box" problem?  I am running
> into that one now, quite a bit.

Unlikely, that's because the user has to be directed to a portal site
of some sort and bridged setups don't have IPs on the bridge.