[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Lee Sharp <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org>
 To:  "m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch" <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] captive portal on multiple interfaces
 Date:  Wed, 20 May 2009 17:59:44 -0500
Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Lee Sharp <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org> wrote:
>> Jonathan De Graeve - M0n0wall wrote:
>>> Very simple,
>>> Our current CP structure is not yet up for it. We first have to migrate to
>>> a new 'storage' container for the CP information.
>>> I don't think multiple interfaces will be there soon, nor is it a
>>> requirement if you use it in a routed environment.
>> Would this fix the "No CP and bridge on the same box" problem?  I am running
>> into that one now, quite a bit.
> Unlikely, that's because the user has to be directed to a portal site
> of some sort and bridged setups don't have IPs on the bridge.

But...  I am bridging opt1 to WAN, and running CP on LAN.  LAN has an 
IP, and opt1 does not need CP.  I just want the devices "outside the 
firewall" (as far as they know) to go through the traffic shaper.