Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Lee Sharp <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org> wrote:
>> Jonathan De Graeve - M0n0wall wrote:
>>> Very simple,
>>> Our current CP structure is not yet up for it. We first have to migrate to
>>> a new 'storage' container for the CP information.
>>> I don't think multiple interfaces will be there soon, nor is it a
>>> requirement if you use it in a routed environment.
>> Would this fix the "No CP and bridge on the same box" problem? I am running
>> into that one now, quite a bit.
> Unlikely, that's because the user has to be directed to a portal site
> of some sort and bridged setups don't have IPs on the bridge.
But... I am bridging opt1 to WAN, and running CP on LAN. LAN has an
IP, and opt1 does not need CP. I just want the devices "outside the
firewall" (as far as they know) to go through the traffic shaper.