[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Melvin <melvin at sleepydragon dot net>
 To:  David Burgess <apt dot get at gmail dot com>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [Fwd: Re: [m0n0wall] NAT - port forwarding from the non-WAN subnet]
 Date:  Sun, 07 Jun 2009 10:01:53 -0400
David Burgess wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Lyle Giese<lyle at lcrcomputer dot net> wrote:
>   
>> I keep hitting reply and it does not go to the list with Thunderbird..
>>
>> Sorry.
>>     
>
>
> That's how the list is set up. You have to hit reply-all, then
> optionally delete the individual you are replying to.
>
> I think you need to set up a static route for your host machines. I'm
> thinking if their routing table shows them on a public subnet with the
> cisco as default gateway, then any packet destined to a private subnet
> will not match any routes in the routing table and thus be routed to
> that gateway. I'm surprised you can even ping the printers on m0n0's
> LAN, unless you have added routes to your hosts manually to find
> m0n0's LAN.
>
> Am I getting warm?
>
> db
>
>   
I would think that if that were the cause of the problem they would also
have to be there for the existing linux box to work.  Unless of course
the interface IPs on the linux box don't match the ones on the m0n0
setup.  Then any existing routes would stop working until they were
adjusted.