[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Michael Jewell <mjewell at law dot umaryland dot edu>
 To:  M0n0wall <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Beta 1.3b17 released
 Date:  Sat, 15 Aug 2009 23:08:34 -0400
Mohammed, I believe what you really want is "User Isolation Mode".  This is
normally a function of the access point you're using.  I don't belive m0n0
supports this using an internal card,  I'd look for an access point that


On 8/15/09 2:38 PM, "Chris Buechler" <cbuechler at gmail dot com> wrote:

> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Mohammed Ismail<m dot ismael at gmail dot com> wrote:
>> I have got an open wifi system connected to that m0n0wall. Allot of people
>> connecting actually not even 500 but I never put it in that way, I just hit
>> a number.
>> I agree with what you said, about available xml options.
>> Now the question is. What it needs to have the option subnet mask. To assign
>> a subnet mask for clients that does not match the LAN subnet which in my
>> case ,
>> LAN :
>> Option subnet
>>  Is there checks on m0n0wall to make sure that clients get same subnet as
>> LAN?
> You should really start a new thread, this has no relevance to the
> 1.3b17 release.
> You never want your DHCP serving something different from your LAN
> subnet. If you want multiple internal subnets, use multiple interfaces
> or VLANs.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch