[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Richard Parvass" <richard dot parvass at aaland dot co dot uk>
 To:  "rene moser" <mail at renemoser dot net>
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Replace mini_httpd?
 Date:  Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:53:01 +0100 (BST)
The entire filesystem on the flash is held in RAM, so if you increase the
filesystem size, you increase the RAM requirement. Many embedded devices
have 128MB or less RAM.

Package size is therefore a big argument for mini_httpd.

Regards

Richard

On Mon, August 17, 2009 22:34, rene moser wrote:
> Hi Manuel
>
> Manuel Kasper wrote:
>> mini_httpd (the web server used in m0n0wall) returns the 401 almost
>> immediately (after receiving the headers) and closes the connection,
>> which Safari doesn't like.
> Are there any plans to replace mini_httpd in next major version of
> m0n0wall?
>
> http://nginx.net/ would be great.
>
> I mean, 1 GB flash cards are almost as cheep as 16 MB flash cards. So
> package size is not really an argument for mini_httpd anymore.
>
> What do you say?
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>