[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Replace mini_httpd?
 Date:  Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:26:44 -0400
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Richard
Parvass<richard dot parvass at aaland dot co dot uk> wrote:
> The entire filesystem on the flash is held in RAM, so if you increase the
> filesystem size, you increase the RAM requirement. Many embedded devices
> have 128MB or less RAM.
>
> Package size is therefore a big argument for mini_httpd.
>

Exactly.