rene moser wrote:
> Hi Manuel
> Manuel Kasper wrote:
>> mini_httpd (the web server used in m0n0wall) returns the 401 almost
>> immediately (after receiving the headers) and closes the connection,
>> which Safari doesn't like.
> Are there any plans to replace mini_httpd in next major version of
> http://nginx.net/ would be great.
> I mean, 1 GB flash cards are almost as cheep as 16 MB flash cards. So
> package size is not really an argument for mini_httpd anymore.
It is when you have 75 firewalls all over with 16 meg flash cards in them!
Remember that your environment is not everyone's environment. :)
Ralf Hesse wrote:
> Is there no possibility to increase these kiddy 128 MB RAM??
In many cases, no. (Or at least not without a soldering iron and some
> I think we should also have a look forward...?
Define forward... Remember that your environment... :)
> There are now standard-RAMs with at least 2 GB available...
> Do these embedded Boards not use standard-SIMMs?
Almost none of them.
> May be we should give some ideas for redesign??;-(
Some people did. You may be a better fit for pfsense.
http://www.pfsense.com/ It is a fork, but a lot of them are here, and a
lot of us are there...