Re: [m0n0wall] Replace mini

From:	=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Moser?= <mail at renemoser dot net>
To:	richard dot parvass at aaland dot co dot uk
Cc:	m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
Subject:	Re: [m0n0wall] Replace mini_httpd? (closed)
Date:	Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:23:48 +0200 (CEST)

> The entire filesystem on the flash is held in RAM, so if you increase the
> filesystem size, you increase the RAM requirement. Many embedded devices
> have 128MB or less RAM.
>
> Package size is therefore a big argument for mini_httpd.

I forgot RAM is the bottleneck in an embedded environment. Never mind.

Regards
René