[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Moser?= <mail at renemoser dot net>
 To:  richard dot parvass at aaland dot co dot uk
 Cc:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Replace mini_httpd? (closed)
 Date:  Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:23:48 +0200 (CEST)
> The entire filesystem on the flash is held in RAM, so if you increase the
> filesystem size, you increase the RAM requirement. Many embedded devices
> have 128MB or less RAM.
> Package size is therefore a big argument for mini_httpd.

I forgot RAM is the bottleneck in an embedded environment. Never mind.