I would vote for IPV6
I would vote against uPNP
2009/12/4 Robert <valnar at yahoo dot com>:
> Now that m0n0wall is at version 1.3, I looked back at what where it started
> and when it came out. A lot has changed in six years. Embedded processors
> are more powerful now and 16Mb CF cards are practically non-existent. We
> all throw away the 32Mb cards that come with our cameras. The original WRAP
> and net4801 boards are discontinued, the ALIX boards are now the platform of
> choice, and earlier this year AMD announced that it stopped development of
> the Geode processor.
> I think the original goals of m0n0wall were to make it as small as possible,
> run from RAM and work on embedded platforms. But the definition of "small"
> has changed. Upgrading the scope of m0n0wall to platforms with 128MB RAM
> and 32MB Flash would be a better target. I still think it should focus as a
> firewall which can be run entirely from RAM, as to not cross paths with
> pfSense, Untangle or other firewalls which need more muscle and read-write
> access to hard drives for caching, like squid. But that being said, there
> are a couple features which could be added without breaking that rule.
> For an entirely selfish reason, I'd like to see UPnP supported added. I
> don't use m0n0wall today for this very reason. I'm forced to use pfSense
> with all its bugs and inability to upgrade easily over the network. Adding
> UPnP as a feature would allow me to return. OpenVPN and load-balancing
> might also be possibilities.
> What other features would people like to see?