[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  "Andrew Tillman" <tillman at leecountylibrary dot org>
 To:  "Lee Sharp" <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org>
 Cc:  "m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch" <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] WAN blocked and should not be
 Date:  Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:44:25 -0500 (EST)
Ah, thank you!!

I didn't see any of that in the literature

The hardware firewall handles NAT and DMZ, so I think I will
try to just give the monowall WAN a different IP scheme and see if that
works. If that doesn't work I will give the hardware firewall a different
IP scheme and go from there.

Thank you for the help, again!!
Andrew Tillman
Tech Specialist
Lee County Library
Leesburg, GA 31763
tillman at leecountylibrary dot org

Andrew Tillman wrote:
>> NAT is turned off.
>> Both IPs are on the same subnet because of the existing
>> network. If I just unhook the WAN will captive
portal still work if
>> monowall is plugged into the switch?
> That is the point.  The CP works through the routed
interface.  You need
> routing.  So you need a second subnet, and
a static route on your
> hardware firewall to the internal subnet
with a next hop of the WAN
> interface.
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch