[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  "Andrew Tillman" <tillman at leecountylibrary dot org>
 To:  "Lee Sharp" <leesharp at hal dash pc dot org>
 Cc:  "m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch" <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] WAN blocked and should not be
 Date:  Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:44:25 -0500 (EST)
Ah, thank you!!

I didn't see any of that in the literature
:(

The hardware firewall handles NAT and DMZ, so I think I will
try to just give the monowall WAN a different IP scheme and see if that
works. If that doesn't work I will give the hardware firewall a different
IP scheme and go from there.

Thank you for the help, again!!
-- 
Andrew Tillman
Tech Specialist
Lee County Library
Leesburg, GA 31763
tillman at leecountylibrary dot org

>
Andrew Tillman wrote:
>> NAT is turned off.
>>
>> Both IPs are on the same subnet because of the existing
internal
>> network. If I just unhook the WAN will captive
portal still work if
>> monowall is plugged into the switch?
> 
> That is the point.  The CP works through the routed
interface.  You need
> routing.  So you need a second subnet, and
a static route on your
> hardware firewall to the internal subnet
with a next hop of the WAN
> interface.
> 
>
			Lee
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> 
>