[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 From:  Chris Buechler <cbuechler at gmail dot com>
 To:  m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
 Subject:  Re: [m0n0wall] Re: m0n0wall 1.3 released
 Date:  Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:54:02 -0500
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Manuel Kasper <mk at neon1 dot net> wrote:
> On 22.02.2010, at 12:15, N.J. Mann wrote:
>> "...  Unfortunately, although the EDNS standard has been around for a
>> long time there are still many "middleboxes" (firewalls, broadband
>> routers, etc.) that have problems with these larger responses."
>> So, will Dnsmasq need update as well?
> Not as far as I know

dnsmasq is fine with EDNS. From the man page:

-P, --edns-packet-max=<size>
Specify the largest EDNS.0 UDP packet which is supported by the DNS
forwarder. Defaults to 4096, which is the RFC5625-recommended size.

m0n0wall uses the default.