On 09/26/2010 08:00 PM, Heinz Teichmann wrote:
> Is Monowall still under development?
Yes. It gets less activity than some projects as it is very stable.
> Is there a chance it will be fixed one day?
If you can define what is "broke." A statement of "This does not work
the way I want it to" is not broke...
> I tried so many things until I realized that the Tunnel always authenticates against the old IP.
There is a "dns-resolve-frequency" kind-of parameter somewhere but that one seems not to work
Um... No... I do have it working on a pipe with one static and one
dynamic IP, and it magically seems to find it when it changes, so your
statement is incorrect. I have not tested it with two dynamic IPs,
however, so I do not know if there is an issue. I do know, however,
that your trouble report is not totally correct.
> The connection works perfect between two AVM Fritzbox 3270 and a Billion 7402NX. But their
firewall is shit.
Good to know.
> So I can choose now what I want. Working firewall or working VPN.
There may be a few other choices, but whatever makes you happy
> I thought many users might have the same situation with two dynamic IPs? :s
I am sure there are. Some of them may even be working with m0n0wall.
However, your trouble report is missing a lot of information we might
need to help you. Like all of it.
Also, attacking the devs on there own list is not a good way to endear
you to them.
(A tad ornery tonight... It has been a rough working weekend.)