|
||||||||||
Hello Heinz, On Fri., Jan 28, 2011, Heinz TEICHMANN wrote: >On Fri., Jan 21, 2011, Michael wrote: >>The change in the configuration was in the menu Firewall/NAT. >>If you choose 'Enable advanced outbound NAT' in the Outbound tab, >>then make sure to deselect 'Disable port mapping' in the entries. >> >I can't confirm this. In my case "Disable port mapping" is always >checked because of SIP. Everywhere in the web interface you see >the new address of the other party, but the racoon logs say that >it is trying to establish a connection to the old IP address. >The biggest trial was 3 sites with version 1.32 and all 3 behave >the same way. > Oh I almost forgot. For good measure I rebooted all three routers after upgrading to the beta image and adding the second outbound NAT rule. If at all possible reboot your routers, verify that IPSec works, and then wait until you're sure the IP address changed on just one router and test your IPSec tunnels again. From a host in the 'Computers with portmapping' NAT region ping other hosts in similar NAT regions over IPSec, and for good measure send TCP traffic (to a webserver port 80 for example.) I need to wait a few minutes sometimes and repeat this process to get the IPSec connected after a dynamic IP address change. Regards, Michael |