[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]
 
 From:  Warren Myers <warren at antipaucity dot com>
 To:  "m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch" <m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch>
 Subject:  RE: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall on non-x86 architectures?
 Date:  Fri, 27 Sep 2013 10:08:47 -0400
Thanks for that, Lee.
Didn't know the beta was usable .. I'll go look through it :)
-Warren

> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:19:02 -0500
> From: leesharp at hal dash pc dot org
> To: m0n0wall at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> Subject: Re: [m0n0wall] m0n0wall on non-x86 architectures?
> 
> On 09/26/2013 01:38 PM, Warren Myers wrote:
> > I noticed the last major release of m0n0wall was in 2012 .. are there any plans to update again?
If not a full (or minor) version update, are there any plans to offer more platform targets (eg
ARM)?
> 
> There has been discussion on ARM before, but the main problem is that 
> ARM is not a full component.  Every ARM device needs special sauce to 
> run and support would be a challenge.
> 
> As for 1.8, that is in beta now, and quite stable.  The thought is to 
> wait for FreeBSD 9.2 and use that as the base before release to have 
> more device support.  FreeBSD 9.2 is releasing in the next few days, and 
> the betas will move to it soon after.  Once stable, I am sure there will 
> be a major release.
> 
> But I am using 1.8b in production in a few locations, so feel free to go 
> with it.
> 
> 			Lee
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: m0n0wall dash unsubscribe at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
> For additional commands, e-mail: m0n0wall dash help at lists dot m0n0 dot ch
>